Sequencing front-to-back modernisation

Sequencing front-to-back modernisation

Capmark research · Published 18 June 2026

At a glance

70–80%

Share of IT budgets consumed by maintaining existing systems

Source: Capmark analysis of published industry research

~30%

Core platform transformations that complete a full migration

Source: Capmark analysis of published transformation research

70%

Digital transformations that exceed their original budget

Source: Capmark analysis of published transformation research

Summary

Most IT budgets go to keeping old systems alive — published estimates put the share at 70–80% — and every regulatory change costs more to absorb on ageing platforms than on new ones. Doing nothing is not neutral; the liability grows every year.

The paper examines why the boldest response fails most often. McKinsey's research finds only about 30% of core platform transformations complete a full migration, 70% of digital transformations exceed their original budgets, and 7% cost more than double. The failure is structural, not managerial: a multi-year programme with one distant go-live accumulates risk out of sight while the legacy estate it was meant to retire keeps running, and keeps billing.

The full paper sets out the sequence that works: data and integration foundations first, then modernisation in slices tied to business value — a desk, an asset class, a process — with go-lives every one to two years and decommissioning in every wave, because the saving is only real when the legacy system switches off.

Download

Get the full paper

Enter your email to download “Sequencing front-to-back modernisation”. We use it to deliver the PDF and, if you opt in, related insights.